antibodies against fundc1 (Novus Biologicals)
Structured Review

Antibodies Against Fundc1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 10 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+fundc1/pmc12921038-481-5-8?v=Novus+Biologicals
Average 93 stars, based on 10 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Endothelial FUNDC1 regulates metabolic reprogramming and the obesity-diabetes transition through the SIRT3/GATA2/endothelin-1 axis"
Article Title: Endothelial FUNDC1 regulates metabolic reprogramming and the obesity-diabetes transition through the SIRT3/GATA2/endothelin-1 axis
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-68548-4
Figure Legend Snippet: a – c CD31 positive ECs (CD31 + ECs) were isolated from white adipose tissue (WAT) of mice fed with indicated durations (2, 4, 6 months) of HFD and subjected to western blot analysis ( n = 4 mice/group) or Q-PCR analysis ( n = 6 mice/group). d – f HUVECs were incubated with 200 μM PA conjugated to fatty acid-free BSA, and culture medium containing PA or BSA was refreshed daily throughout the 7-day stimulation period to maintain a consistent lipid challenge. Cells were then subjected to western blot analysis or Q-PCR analysis. n = 3 independent experiments. g CD31 positive cells were removed from the SVF of Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 - or Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 + mice (CD31 - SVF). Normal SVF containing CD31 positive cells was used as control (CD31 + SVF). Cells were then differentiated into adipocytes. Scale bar: 50 µm. h Intracellular TG content in ( g ). n = 6 independent experiments. i Insulin-stimulated 2-NBDG uptake in primary adipocytes isolated from Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 - or Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 + mice in the present of bovine serum albumin (BSA) or palmitic acid (PA). n = 8 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Isolation, Western Blot, Incubation, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: a – l Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 + mice and littermates ( Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 - ) were kept on HFD for 6 months. a Changes in body weight during HFD feeding. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (HFD- Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 - vs . HFD- Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 +) , n = 15–20. b Fat percentage of mice. n = 15–20 mice/group. c Adipose tissue weight/body weight. n = 15–20 mice/group. d Representative images of H&E staining of SubWAT. e Quantification of siz e s and numbers of adipocytes under HFD feeding. n = 15–20 mice/group. f Quantification of adipocyte diameter. n = 15–20 mice/group. g Glucose tolerance test (GTT) and quantification of the area under curve, n = 7-8 mice/group. h Insulin tolerance test (ITT) and quantification of the area under curve, n = 7–8 mice/group. i , j Whole body respiratory exchange ratio (RER; VCO 2 /VO 2 , n = 8 mice/group). k , l Energy expenditure normalized to body weight, n = 8 mice/group. Data are presented as mea n ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Mice were placed on a high-fat diet (HFD) and infused with ET-1 (10 µg/kg/day) or saline concurrently, starting at the onset of HFD feeding, using subcutaneously implanted osmotic pumps for 4 weeks. a Representative pictures of whole body, epididymal white adipose tissue (EpiWAT), subcutaneous white adipose tissue (SubWAT), and brown adipose tissue (BAT). b Changes in body weight during HFD feeding periods (left panel), * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (Saline- Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 - vs . Saline- Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 + ), # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 (ET-1- Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 - vs . ET-1- Fundc1 f/Y Cdh5 + ), and relative weights of adipose tissues ( right panel). n = 7–8 mice/group. c Glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) and insulin tolerance test (ITT). n = 7–8 mice/group. d Fasting blood glucose (GLU) level. n = 7–8 mice/group. e Serum insulin level. n = 7–8 mice/group. f Serum free fatty acid (FFA) level. n = 7–8 mice/group. g – i Aortic ring vasoreactivity assay in ET-1-infused mice. n = 6 mice/group. j , k Circumferential cyclic strain ( j ) and (PWV) pulse wave velocity ( k ) of carotid artery. n = 6 mice/group. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Saline
Figure Legend Snippet: a HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or FUNDC1 siRNA ( siFUNDC1 ) and subjected to immunoblotting analysis. b Quantification of protein levels of ECE1, GATA2, and AP1. n = 6 independent experiments. c HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or FUNDC1 siRNA ( siFUNDC1 ) and subjected to Q-PCR analysis to detect ECE1, AP1, and JUN mRNA levels. n = 8 independent experiments. d HUVECs were transfected with control Myc-Flag-tagged plasmid ( Myc-Flag-Ctrl ) or Myc-Flag-FUNDC1 plasmid ( Myc-Flag-FUNDC1 ) and subjected to immunoblotting analysis. e Quantification of protein levels of FUNDC1, ECE1, GATA2 and AP1 in ( d ). n = 6 independent experiments. f HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or GATA2 siRNA ( siGATA2 ) and subjected to Q-PCR analysis to detect EDN1 mRNA levels. n = 8 independent experiments. g HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or FUNDC1 siRNA ( siFUNDC1 ) and were then treat with 200 µM PA for indicated time periods. h - j Quantification of protein levels of FUNDC1, GATA2, and ET-1 in ( g ). n = 4 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Control, Western Blot, Plasmid Preparation
Figure Legend Snippet: a HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or SIRT3 siRNA ( siSIRT3 ) and subjected to immunoblotting analysis. b Quantification of protein levels in ( a ). n = 8–10 independent experiments. c HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or SIRT3 siRNA ( siSIRT3 ) and subjected to Q-PCR analysis to detect mRNA levels of GATA2 and EDN1 . n = 8 independent experiments. d The interactions between SIRT3 and FUNDC1 or GATA2 in HUVECs were determined by immunoprecipitation (IP) and immunoblotting (IB) analysis. e The co-localization of SIRT3 and FUNDC1 or GATA2 were determined by immunofluorescence staining. Nuclei were stained by DAPI. MERGE1 indicates merge of SIRT3 and DAPI; MERGE2 indicates merge of FUNDC1, SIRT3, and DAPI; MERGE3 indicates merge of GATA2 and DAPI; MERGE4 indicates merge of GATA2, SIRT3, and DAPI. Scale bar: 10 µm. f HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or FUNDC1 siRNA ( siFUNDC1 ) in the presence of BSA or 200 µM PA and subjected to immunofluorescence staining analysis. MERGE1 indicates merge of SIRT3 and DAPI; MERGE2 indicates merge of FUNDC1, SIRT3, and DAPI. Scale bar: 10 µm. g Pearson’s coefficient calculated by ZEN software, indicates the co-localization of FUNDC1 and SIRT3. n = 9 cells from three independent experiments. h Quantification of nuclear SIRT3 level. i HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or FUNDC1 siRNA ( siFUN ) in the presence of BSA or 200 µM PA. Non-nuclear fraction (Non-Nuc), nuclear fraction (Nuc), and mitochondria fraction (Mito) were prepared and subjected to immunoblotting analysis. n = 9 cells from three independent experiments. j Quantification of protein level of SIRT3 long isoform (SIRT3-L) in the nucleus (Nuclear SIRT3-L) and in mitochondria (Mitochondrial SIRT3-L). n = 4 independent experiments. k HUVECs were double transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or FUNDC1 ( siFUN ) and SIRT3 siRNA and subjected to immunoblotting analysis. l Quantification of GATA2 protein level in ( k ). n = 5 independent experiments. m HUVECs were double transfected with either control siRNA (siCtrl) or FUNDC1 and SIRT3 siRNA and subjected to Q-PCR analysis to detect END1 mRNA level. n = 8 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Control, Western Blot, Immunoprecipitation, Immunofluorescence, Staining, Software
Figure Legend Snippet: a HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or SIRT3 siRNA and then treated with 50 µg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for 240 min. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting analysis. b Quantification of GATA2 protein level in ( a ). n = 4 independent experiments. c Acetylated GATA2 level was determined by IP of acetylate lysine (Ac-lysine) in cells transfected with SIRT3 siRNA and followed by immunoblotting (IB) of GATA2. d Quantification of the enrichment of acetylated GATA2 in ( c ). n = 4 independent experiments. e Acetylated GATA2 level was determined by IP of Ac-lysine in cells treated with PA (200 µM) and followed by immunoblotting (IB) GATA2. f Quantification of the enrichment of acetylated GATA2 in ( e ). n = 4 independent experiments. g HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or SIRT3 siRNA ( siSIRT3 ) and subjected to immunoblotting analysis. h HUVECs were transfected with control Myc-Flag-tagged plasmid ( Myc-Flag-Ctrl ) or Myc-Flag-SIRT3 plasmid ( Myc-Flag-SIRT3 ) and subjected to immunoblotting analysis. i , j Quantification of protein levels of FUNDC1. n = 6–9 independent experiments. k HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or SIRT3 siRNA ( siSIRT3 and subjected to Q-PCR analysis to detect FUNDC1 mRNA level. n = 8. l HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or SIRT3 siRNA and then treated with 50 µg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for 240 min. Cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting analysis. m Quantification of GATA2 protein level in ( l ). n = 3 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD, in ( b and m ), star represents the comparison between groups siCtrl and siSIRT3 at the same treatment intervals, pound represents the comparison with control group (time = 0 min). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05. # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Transfection, Control, Western Blot, Plasmid Preparation, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: a Potential KFERQ-like motifs of human FUNDC1 and SIRT3. b Interactions between HSC70 with FUNDC1 and SIRT3-L in HUVECs were detected by IP and IB. c Co-staining of FUNDC1 with HSC70 and SIRT3-L by IF. d Interaction of SIRT3-L and FUNDC1 was analyzed in HUVECs transfected with HSC70 siRNA. e Quantification of protein levels in HUVECS transfected with HSC70 siRNA. f Quantification of the binding activity of FUNDC1 with SIRT3-L in HSC70 knockdown cells, indicated by the enrichment of FUNDC1. n = 4 independent experiments. g HUVECs were transfected with control siRNA (siCtrl) or HSC70 siRNA ( siHSC70 ) in the presence of BSA or 200 µM PA. Non-nuclear fraction (Non-Nuc), nuclear fraction (Nuc), and mitochondria fraction (Mito) were prepared and subjected to immunoblotting analysis. h Quantification of protein level of SIRT3 long isoform (SIRT3-L) in the nucleus (Nuclear SIRT3-L) and in mitochondria (Mitochondrial SIRT3-L). n = 4 independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± SD, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 derived from Student’s t tests.
Techniques Used: Staining, Transfection, Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Knockdown, Control, Western Blot, Derivative Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Plasma and endothelium were collected from age-matched healthy donors ( n = 17) or donors with both obesity and T2DM (Obesity&T2DM, n = 19). a Characteristics of human donors. Age, body mass index (BMI), and glycohemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are represented as mean ± SD. b Plasma ET-1 level in human donors. n = 17–19 donors/group. c Spearman’s correlation of plasma ET-1 level and BMI. d Spearman’s correlation of plasma ET-1 level and HbA1c. e qPCR analysis of FUNDC1 , END1 and GATA2 mRNA levels in the intima isolated from human small arterioles. n = 17–19 donors/group. f Spearman’s correlation of mRNA levels of FUNDC1 and END1 . g Spearman’s correlation of mRNA levels of GATA2 and END1 . h Spearman’s correlation of intimal FUNDC1 mRNA and plasma ET-1. i , j Human small arterioles were collected from age-matched healthy donors or donors with both obesity and T2DM (Obesity&T2DM) and subjected to western blot analysis ( i and j ). n = 6 donors/group. k , l Human femoral arteries were collected from age-matched healthy donors (n = 7) or donors with both obesity and T2DM (Obesity&T2DM; n = 5) and subjected to IHC staining. Scale bar: 50 µm. Data are presented as mean ± SD. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, n.s. p > 0.05.
Techniques Used: Clinical Proteomics, Isolation, Western Blot, Immunohistochemistry
Figure Legend Snippet: In the healthy state, endothelial FUNDC1 anchors SIRT3-L in mitochondria, limiting its nuclear accumulation and regulating its interaction with GATA2, thereby maintaining normal ET-1 production and preserving vascular and metabolic homeostasis. Under overnutrition-induced metabolic stress, SIRT3-L is released from GATA2, contributing to enhanced GATA2-mediated ET-1 transcription. Elevated ET-1 promote angiogenesis to provide the space for adipocyte hyperplasia at the early stage and later exacerbate insulin resistance and thus driving the progression from obesity to T2DM. Importantly, SIRT3-L translocation to mitochondria also facilitates FUNDC1 degradation at the early obese stage, which triggers a compensatory increase in FUNDC1 transcription and ultimately results in FUNDC1 overexpression in a late-stage. The elevation of FUNDC1 further enhances mitochondrial recruitment of SIRT3-L, amplifying ET-1 production. In contrast, in Fundc1 EC-specific knockout (ECKO) mice, the absence of FUNDC1 prevents mitochondrial recruitment of SIRT3-L, leading to its nuclear retention, where SIRT3-L promotes GATA2 degradation and suppresses ET-1 transcription. The loss of Fundc1 in ECs not only suppresses angiogenesis at early overnutrition stage but also prevents EC senescence at late stage to attenuate the potential diabetic vascular complications.
Techniques Used: Preserving, Translocation Assay, Over Expression, Knock-Out

